Legal Opinion

Cowart v. Poore

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 4, 1999No. 3054PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

Johnny F. Cowart filed a legal malpractice action against Bruce M. Poore, Cowart’s former attorney, alleging: (1) breach of contract; (2) negligence; and (3) violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act. The Circuit Court judge granted Poore’s motion to dismiss. Cowart appeals. We affirm.1

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Poore represented Cowart in a mortgage foreclosure action. An hourly fee arrangement was agreed upon. Cowart also requested Poore represent him in a counterclaim against the mortgagee. Poore filed the action but notified Cowart he would not litigate it. By consent…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stiles v. OnoratoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Harper v. EthridgeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Brown v. LeveretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Toussaint v. Ham Ex Rel. Bailey Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flateau v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Williams v. CondonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Ashley River Properties I, LLC v. Ashley River Properties II, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Employee Resource Management, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  5. Watts v. Metro Security AgencyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API