Legal Opinion

Williams v. Condon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 1, 2001No. 3392PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Tim Williams sued Charles M. Condon and W. Barney Giese, individually and in their official capacities, seeking damages resulting from their alleged violations of 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 and common law tortious conduct. Condon is the Attorney General of South Carolina. Giese is the Solicitor of the Fifth Judicial Circuit. Condon and Giese, asserting their immunity as prosecutors, moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for. dismissal of Williams’ action. The Circuit Court granted the motion and dismissed the case. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Williams was an employee of Premier…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Doe v. MarionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Rydde v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Flateau v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API