Legal Opinion

Flateau v. Harrelson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 2003No. 3652PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J:

Ruby Flateau and Herbert S. Fielding, employees of the South Carolina Commission for the Blind (Commission), appeal the circuit court’s dismissal of their tort actions against the following members of the Commission’s governing board: Robert M. Harrelson, Oliver H. Willis, Stella G. Williams, E. Lynn W. Smith, and Earlene S. Gardner (collectively, “the Board”). On appeal, Flateau and Fielding argue the court erred in finding: (1) the South Carolina Tort Claims Act (Act) provided the exclusive remedy for Flateau and Fielding; (2) the Act’s two-year statute of limitations barred the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Faile v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile JusticeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Stiles v. OnoratoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Gentry v. YonceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Dawkins v. Union Hospital DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity Providence HospitalsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Newkirk v. EnzorDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API