Legal Opinion

Harper v. Ethridge

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 2, 1986No. 0790PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action arising from a partnership agreement. Floyd I. Harper, one of the partners, sued O. A. Ethridge and George H. Fann, two other partners, alleging three causes of action. The first cause of action alleges breach of fiduciary duty and seeks recovery of a one-third partnership interest in certain real property and contract rights of the partnership. The second cause of action alleges Harper was wrongfully excluded from the partnership and seeks damages for breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act. The third cause of action seeks an equitable accounting…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Welborn v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  3. Jacobson v. YaschikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. McMahan v. McMahonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Conner v. City of Forest AcresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Greene v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  3. Edens v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. Aiken County v. BSP Division of Envirotech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. Scott v. Mid-Carolina Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API