Legal Opinion
Smith v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided January 2, 2005No. Civ. No. 2002-227PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
(January 2, 2005)
The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons explained below, I find that, of the nine counts alleged in her amended complaint, the plaintiff has alleged facts sufficient to support a cause of action against the Virgin Islands Port Authority [“VIPA”] for breach of contract, constructive discharge, violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, violation of section 531 of Title III of the Virgin…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hewett v. Willingboro Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- United States v. Southland Gaming of Virgin Islands, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2016
- Fenton v. C&C Construction & Maintenance, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2007
- Roebuck v. Virgin Islands Housing AuthoritySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Davis v. RagsterDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.