Legal Opinion
People v. Hinojos-Mendoza
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 14, 2006No. 03CA0645PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebb, J.
Defendant, Oscar Hinojos-Mendoza, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession with intent to distribute one thousand grams or more of a schedule II controlled substance, under a former version of § 18-18-405(3)(a), C.R.S.2004. Defendant also appeals his sentence of sixteen years in the Department of Corrections (DOC). We affirm.
According to the People’s evidence, a person (informant) who had just been arrested on drug charges agreed to cooperate with the police and arranged through a telephone call made in their presence to purchase a kilogram…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- State v. MarchSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- People v. Cevallos-AcostaColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Grant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- State v. CragerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.