Legal Opinion

State v. March

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 20, 2007No. SC 87902PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Appellant Robert March challenges his conviction of second-degree drug trafficking, section 195.233, RSMo 2000. He contends that a laboratory report identifying as cocaine base the substance seized during a search of his girlfriend’s apartment was testimonial evidence under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). He argues that his confrontation rights were violated because the report was admitted into evidence even though the crime laboratory analyst who prepared the report did not testify at trial. This Court finds that the report…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. RawlinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API