Grant v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.
In this appeal of his conviction for aggravated robbery, appellant Jermaine Andre Grant argues the trial court twice violated his state and federal constitutional rights to confront the witnesses against him, and improperly denied his motion for mistrial after the prosecution alluded to his failure to testify. We hold that appellant waived his first confrontation clause complaint, and although we agree that the trial court erred in admitting testimonial statements contained in appellant’s high school disciplinary records, we conclude the error was harmless beyond…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Dixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Acevedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- Campos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.