Egilbert v. Hall
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover upon a promissory note, executed by defendants, and reading as follows:
“Know All Men By These Presents
That we, the undersigned, Ruby J. Codding, Ida Jewell D ’Egilbert, George Jewell, and Grace B. Hood, owners or parties in interest of the Hood ranch and personal properties in Batchelor Valley, Lake County, California, are legally indebted to William D ’Egilbert of San Juan, Puerto Rico, inAhe sum of two thousand, one hundred and forty-six dollars and 35/100 cents for loans or advances made in the interest of the preservation of the said property, as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Light v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Weaver v. GrunbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BettencourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clyne v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Garthofner v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Cohen v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Greene v. FickertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Johnson v. McArthurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.