Legal Opinion

Greene v. Fickert

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1942No. Civ. No. 2570Published

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff and respondent instituted this action against defendants and appellants Louise Fickert and Nellie Fickert, individually and as administratrices with the will annexed of the estate of Frederick A. Fickert, deceased, to quiet title to an easement to use a certain spring located on appellants’ land. The trial court decreed that appellants’ predecessor in title, by conveyance of a portion of his estate to respondent, transferred an easement to use a spring on grantor’s reserved portion in favor of the granted estate. The complaint is in the ordinary form of a complaint in a quiet title…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Jersey Farm Co. v. Atlanta Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Vargas v. MaderosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kallenburg v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Swarzwald v. CooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API