Legal Opinion

Light v. Stevens

California Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1911No. S.F. No. 5266PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Napa County denying a new trial. Henry C. Gesford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial in an action upon a promissory note for three thousand dollars, given by defendant’s intestate to plaintiff on April 15, 1902. The case was tried by a jury and a verdict was rendered for the full amount of said note, with interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum from its date and for five hundred dollars attorney fees. The defense relied on by defendant was payment by the decedent in his life-time of the full amount of the note and interest.

This is the second appeal in this case. On a former trial, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Galbraith v. StarksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Griffith v. LewinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Somervail v. GilliesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Wessel v. BishopNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BettencourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Levey v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fairbanks v. Crump Irrigation & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Remington Investments, Inc. v. HamedaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. McKenzie v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API