Legal Opinion
Clyne v. Brock
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1947No. Civ. 7380PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Some time prior to 1920, defendant Frank Brock purchased a ranch from his mother Jeanette M. Brock, giving her a note and mortgage for the unpaid balance of the purchase price. This was followed by a note and trust deed dated October 25, 1927, which apparently was a renewal of the original note and mortgage, and which in turn was followed by a trust deed and note dated October 5, 1932, in the amount of $25,000. All of said instruments, except the first, were signed by Frank and his wife Ethel, the other defendant herein. Five years later Frank and Ethel entered into an agreement with Jeanette…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Faylor v. FaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Pomeroy v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Croce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cope v. CopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Petty v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Porter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Anten v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Pryor v. BondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.