Legal Opinion

Garthofner v. Edmonds

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1946No. Civ. 7235PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

A rehearing was granted in this case to correct an error with respect to the nature of the original obligation upon which an alleged novation occurred. With that modification the opinion is approved as follows:

The plaintiff appealed from a judgment which was rendered pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint without leave to amend the pleading. The complaint is founded on an alleged oral agreement of Amanda B. Carter to personally assume and pay a former joint and several oral obligation of herself and her deceased husband to pay plaintiff the sum of $495, for money…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. California Canning Peach Growers v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Alexander v. BoutonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Young v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Colley v. Chowchilla National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kaliterna v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Exchange Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Cabot v. First National Bank of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Besoyan v. Division of Labor Law EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API