Legal Opinion

Texas State Commission v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 26, 1984No. 132-83CPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Judge.

Introduction

This case comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Reply briefs have been filed and oral argument has been held.

Plaintiff, Texas State Commission for the Blind (TSCB), seeks enforcement of an arbitration decision holding defendant, the United States, liable for monies unlawfully withheld under the income-sharing provisions of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (Act). 20 U.S.C. §§ 107-107Í (1976). Plaintiff claims damages in excess of $10 million. Defendant argues the Act’s “military exemption,” 20 U.S.C. § 107d-3(d), exempts it from liability.

*732…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. Texas State Commission for the Blind and State of Texas v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Active Network, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Education Cabinet, Department for the Blind v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Tamashiro v. Department of Human ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API