Legal Opinion
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Education Cabinet, Department for the Blind v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 21, 2005No. 05-5010PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
In October 2003, the Department of the Army issued a solicitation for bids on a contract to provide services for a military cafeteria at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The solicitation indicated that the contract was subject to the Randolph-Sheppard Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 107 et seq. (“RSA”). Under the RSA, state licensing authorities representing the interests of licensed blind vendors are allowed to submit bids on federal contracts on behalf of those vendors, and those bids are given special consideration. Id. § 107(b). Regulations promulgated under the RSA require federal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. YungkauSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kentucky v. United States Ex Rel. HangelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Kansas ex rel. Kansas Department for Children & Families v. SourceAmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- In Re MravikUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- Mission Critical Solutions v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Colorado Department of Human Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.