Legal Opinion

Tamashiro v. Department of Human Services

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2006No. 24552PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C. J.

This case arises from the alleged failure of defendants-appellants/cross-appellees Department of Human Services (DHS), State of Hawaii (the State), Lillian B. Koller, Joe Cordova, Dave Eveland, and Stephen Teeter 2 [hereinafter, collectively, the State defendants] to enforce Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 102-14 (Supp.2005) and 347-12.5 (1993), quoted infra, and the implementing regulation, Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) § 17-402-17, quoted infra, [hereinafter, collectively, the Hawaii Randolph-Sheppard Act (the Hawaii RSA) ] as against defendant City…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  3. Cottage Savings Assn. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Amantiad v. OdumHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nuuanu Valley Ass'n v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kapuwai v. City & County of Honolulu, Department of Parks & RecreationHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  3. HAWAII HOME INFUSION ASSOCIATES v. BefitelHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pacific Lightnet, Inc. v. Time Warner Telecom, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Liberty Dialysis-Hawaii, LLC v. Rainbow Dialysis, LLC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API