Legal Opinion
Active Network, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 6, 2017No. 16-1071CPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-award Bid Protest; Price Realism Analysis; Disparate Treatment Claim; Past Performance Evaluation; Meaningful Discussions; Protestor’s Burden to Show Prejudice; Remand.
OPINION AND ORDER 1
WHEELER, Judge.
In this post-award bid protest, Plaintiff Active Network, LLC (“Active”) challenges a contract award by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service to Booz Allen Hamilton (“BAH”). The contract is for Recreation One Stop (“R1S”) support services, a program which allows members of the public to make on-line reservations to visit national parks, memorials, and museums, among…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- American Relocation Connections, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Ames 1, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Centerra Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Cw Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Digiflight, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.