Legal Opinion

Darell Nash, Sr. v. Michelle Eberlin

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2006No. 05-3499PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of habeas relief to Petitioner-Appellee Darell Nash, Sr. (“Nash”). Nash was convicted in Ohio state court of felonious assault, and he sought habeas relief on the basis that the manifest weight of the evidence did not support his conviction. The State argues that the district court erred in construing Nash’s manifest-weight-of-the-evidence claim as a claim for insufficiency of the evidence and that Nash is not entitled to habeas relief on the basis of insufficiency. Nash asserts that the district court correctly…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Frank E. Adams v. Flora J. Holland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Snapp, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Johnny O. Clark v. Robert WallerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Karl Kraus, Jr. v. Clark TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Jeffries v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Ob'saint v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Inst.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API