Legal Opinion
Frank E. Adams v. Flora J. Holland, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 20, 2003No. 00-6575PublishedCited by 232 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
BATTANI, District Judge.
Before the court is Petitioner-Appellant Frank Adams’s appeal from the denial of his habeas petition by the Middle District of Tennessee, Honorable District Court Judge Robert L. Echols. Appellant now preserves for appeal his claim for habeas relief based on the state trial court’s admission of his co-defendant Timothy Cro-well’s hearsay testimony at trial, arguing that the admission of that statement violated Appellant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Appellee argues that Appellant has proce.-durally defaulted his habeas…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Robert E. Wenger, Jr. v. Frederick K. Frank Attorney General of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by232 opinions
- Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- In Re Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman, Movant. Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Ellis v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Darell Nash, Sr. v. Michelle EberlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.