Legal Opinion
Hilton v. Braunskill
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 26, 1987No. 86-108PublishedCited by 1,849 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23(c) provides that, when the Government appeals a decision granting a writ of habeas corpus, the habeas petitioner shall be released from custody “unless the court or justice or judge rendering the decision, or the court of appeals or the Supreme Court, or a judge or justice of either court shall otherwise order.” Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23(d) states that initial orders issued pursuant to Rule 23(c) shall “govern review in the court of appeals and in the Supreme Court unless for special reasons shown . . . the order shall be modified, or an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,849 opinions
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Anthony Mays v. Thomas DartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Michael G. Levine v. Patricia Torvik, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
1,844 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.