Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Snapp, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 9, 2008No. 19-3435PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClay, J.
SUHRHEINRICH, J. (pp. 510-11), delivered a separate concurring opinion. COOK, J. (p. 511), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Relator SNAPP, Inc. brings this qui tarn action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., claiming that Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) fraudulently induced the federal government to contract with Ford by inflating, in official reports to the government, the extent of Ford’s dealings with small and minority-owned businesses. The district court dismissed Relator’s complaint for failure to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Iqbal v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States Ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Gunasekera v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Proctor v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Leisure Caviar, LLC v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.