Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Specht v. Painesville Township Local School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1980No. 80-235PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue before this court is whether appellant is entitled to a continuing contract as a teacher pursuant to R. C. 3319.11, where appellant is certified, has achieved continuing service status as a teacher in another school district in Ohio and has served as an assistant principal in the appellee school district four years under limited contracts of employment.

We hold that appellant is entitled to a continuing contract of employment as a teacher.

The relevant Revised Code sections in the instant cause are R. C. 3319.02, 3319.09 and 3319.11.

*148R. C. 3319.02 reads, in pertinent part, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RuppertOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Saltsman v. BurtonOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Henrich v. Hoffman, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Lucas County Board of Commissioners v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. O'Neil v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CarswellOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. EtheridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Donah v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Donah v. Windham Exempted Village School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. EtheridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API