Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Donah v. Windham Exempted Village School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 1992-2607Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 69 Ohio St.3d 114.] [THE STATE EX REL.] DONAH, APPELLANT, v. WINDHAM EXEMPTED VILLAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Donah v. Windham Exempted Village School Dist. Bd. of Edn.,

1994-Ohio-17.] Schools—Determining whether employee is an administrator or a teacher—R.C. 3319.02(A) phrase "working with students" requires the presence of the student(s) when the activity is performed. (No. 92-2607—Submitted February 22, 1994—Decided April 27, 1994.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Portage County,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Wisintainer v. Elcen Power Strut Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API