Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Donah v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 92-2607PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the relator must establish (1) that relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) that respondent has a clear legal duty to perform the acts, and (3) that relator has no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Manson v. Morris (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 440, 441, 613 N.E.2d 232, 233-234, citing State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 29, 6 OBR 50, 51, 451 N.E.2d 225, 226.

Continuing contracts of employment, i.e., tenure, for teachers are provided for in R.C. 3319.11. State ex rel. Kelley…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Wisintainer v. Elcen Power Strut Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Donah v. Windham Exempted Village School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Warner v. Warner, Unpublished Decision (9-28-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API