Legal Opinion

Lucas County Board of Commissioners v. City of Toledo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1971No. 71-352PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented by this ease is whether R. C. 5739.23(H) was, in effect, repealed by the enactment of R. C. 5739.23(1).

R. C. 5739.23(H) provides that:

‘ ‘ The relative need of each subdivision shall be multiplied by the relative need factor to determine the proportionate share of the subdivision in the undivided local government fund of the county, provided that the maximum proportionate share of a county shall not exceed the following maximum percentages of the total estimate of the undivided local government fund governed by the relationship of the percentage of the population of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leach v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Henrich v. Hoffman, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. O'Neil v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re Estate of FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Shaffer v. DefenbacherOhio Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. FrostOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Cincinnati v. Thomas Soft Ice Cream, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. General Motors Corp. v. McAvoyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API