Lucas County Board of Commissioners v. City of Toledo
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question presented by this ease is whether R. C. 5739.23(H) was, in effect, repealed by the enactment of R. C. 5739.23(1).
R. C. 5739.23(H) provides that:
‘ ‘ The relative need of each subdivision shall be multiplied by the relative need factor to determine the proportionate share of the subdivision in the undivided local government fund of the county, provided that the maximum proportionate share of a county shall not exceed the following maximum percentages of the total estimate of the undivided local government fund governed by the relationship of the percentage of the population of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leach v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Henrich v. Hoffman, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- O'Neil v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Estate of FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Shaffer v. DefenbacherOhio Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. FrostOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Cincinnati v. Thomas Soft Ice Cream, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- General Motors Corp. v. McAvoyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.