Legal Opinion

State v. Ruppert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1978No. 77-1022PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeNey, J.

The first issue confronting this court is whether an accused charged with an offense punishable by death' who has waived his right to a trial by jury may be convicted only by a unanimous vote of the three-judge panel. R. C. 2945.06 clearly provides that in a criminal case involving the death penalty tried to a panel of three judges the “ * * * judges or a majority of them may decide all questions of fact and law arising upon the trial, and render judgment accordingly.” .

Although the above portions of R. C. 2945.06 have never been repealed, it is contended. that the provisions have been…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. KeeneOhio Supreme Court · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API