Legal Opinion
Eberli v. Cirrus Design Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 19, 2009No. Case 08-60273-CIVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO PRECLUDE AND/OR LIMIT TESTIMONY
URSULA UNGARO, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Preclude and/or Limit Testimony of Plaintiffs Experts Donald Sommer and Arthur Lee Coffman and Cirrus’s Expert David Klepacki (“Def.’s Mot.”), filed by Defendant Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. (“Teledyne”) on April 24, 2009. (D.E. 101.) Defendant Cirrus Design Corporation (“Cirrus”) filed its Response in opposition (“Def.’s Resp.”) on May 11, 2009. (D.E. 121.) Plaintiff filed her Response in opposition (“Pl.’s Resp.”) on May 11, 2009. (D.E. 124.)
THE COURT has…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Quiet Technology DC-8, Inc., Quiet Technology, Inc. v. Hurel-Dubois UK LTD.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Rink v. Cheminova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. PHL Variable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Buck v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Webb v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- United States v. ZolotDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.