Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided August 31, 2015No. MDL Docket No. 2329; No. 1:13-cv-297-WSDPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1314 OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 27, 2012, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “Panel”) ordered the centralization-of five actions pending in five districts, involving alleged defects in Wright Medical Technology Inc.’s Conserve line of hip implant products. (In re: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, 1:12-md-2329 (“MDL”), [1] (the “February 27, 2012, MDL Order”)). Most of the plaintiffs’ claims focus on the alleged propensity of the metal-on-metal design of the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Shire US IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  2. Coblin v. DePuy Orthopaedics IncDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  3. Coco Rico LLC v. Universal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
  4. Fitzsimmons v. Biomet OrthopedicsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  5. IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API