Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
*1314 OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 27, 2012, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “Panel”) ordered the centralization-of five actions pending in five districts, involving alleged defects in Wright Medical Technology Inc.’s Conserve line of hip implant products. (In re: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, 1:12-md-2329 (“MDL”), [1] (the “February 27, 2012, MDL Order”)). Most of the plaintiffs’ claims focus on the alleged propensity of the metal-on-metal design of the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Blackburn v. Shire US IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Coblin v. DePuy Orthopaedics IncDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Coco Rico LLC v. Universal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
- Fitzsimmons v. Biomet OrthopedicsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.