Summerrise v. Stephens
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Quaere: Is an action for damages for a tort 1 committed in this state by a then resident of this state, who subsequently became a resident of another state, tolled by his absence from the state as provided in RCW 4.16.180 2 during a period when the plaintiff was aware of the claimed tort-feasor’s place of residence and had available to him the right to proceed under RCW 4.28.185 3 , the long-arm statute?
Answer: No.
In reaching our answer, we have been influenced by decisions of other appellate courts which have answered the question in the same way and by our own analysis of legislative intent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reed, Admr. v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
- Benally v. PigmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Bolduc v. RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
- Whittington v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Smith v. Forty Million, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Stenberg v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Gary Dean Broad Denise Broad, Husband and Wife v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Greenwood v. WierdsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.