Duke v. Boyd
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
942 P.2d 351 (1997)
133 Wash.2d 80
Joan DUKE, Appellant,
v.
Dr. Herschell BOYD and Marili Boyd, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 64099-8.
Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.
Argued January 22, 1997.
Decided August 21, 1997.
Debra Stephens, Bryan Harnetiaux, Spokane, Harbaugh & Bloom, Gary N. Bloom, Spokane, amicus curiae on Behalf of Washington State Trial Lawyers.
Thorsrud, Cane & Paulich, Russell C. Love, Seattle, amicus curiae on Behalf of Washington Defense Trial Lawyers.
David A. Middaugh, Seattle, for Appellant.
Lee, Smart, Cook, Martin & Patterson, John P. Cook, Lisa Hollomon, Seattle,…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Durham; Concurrence · Talmadge.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- American Continental Insurance v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.