Greenwood v. Wierdsma

URBIGKIT, Justice.

This medical malpractice case presents three issues for review: (1) interpretation of the statute of limitations; (2) the propriety of the trial court’s summary judgment for defendants, doctor and hospital; and (3) the hospital’s claim of privilege from discovery access to the hospital credential committee’s files and information. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Constituting only what was alleged, contended by affidavit, or portrayed by brief upon initial procedural summary-judgment disposition, and in no way determinative of what trial evidence may subsequently demonstrate, we…