Legal Opinion

Bolduc v. Richards

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 29, 1958No. 4650PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The issue before us is whether a suit for personal injuries arising from a motor vehicle accident in New Hampshire must be brought within six years after the right of action accrued regardless of whether the defendant was absent from the state during most of that period. The question is one of statutory interpretation and it is too elementary to require citation that this resolves itself into one of legislative intent. The pertinent statute of limitations in substantially its present form was first enacted in R. S., c. 181, ss. 3, 4, 9. The applicable sections now read: “Actions of trespass…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reed, Admr. v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. DeitzTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Avery v. First Resolution Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Summerrise v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Benally v. PigmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Forbes v. BoyntonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API