Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Modglin v. DJO Global Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 2, 2014No. Case No. CV 12-07152 MMM (JCGx)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
Qui tam relators Doris Modglin and Russ Milko filed this action against defendants DJO Global Inc. (“DJO Global”), DJO, LLC (“DJO”), DJO Finance LLC (“DJO Finance”), Orthofix, Inc. (“Ortho-fix”), Biomet, Inc. (“Biomet”), and EBI, LP (“EBI”) under seal and in camera on August 20, 2012. Relators invoked the court’s federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and alleged a single claim for violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A) & (B).1 On December…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Vasserman v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Victoria v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Bentley v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- United States ex rel. Phalp v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- United States v. FacteauCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.