Legal Opinion
People v. Stark
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 2005No. E035533PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant Kane Automotive Group (Kane) appeals from the trial court’s February 6, 2004, orders concerning a sale of assets by court-appointed receiver, Byron Z. Moldo, Esq. (Moldo). In the orders, the trial court denied Moldo’s motion to approve a sale to Kane of the assets of an auto dealership (the Kia dealership assets) following a public auction of the assets, voided Kane’s contractual right to match the highest bid received at auction, directed Moldo to conduct a second auction, and confirmed a sale of the Kia dealership assets to the highest bidder at the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 904California Supreme Court · 1946
- Official Committee of Subordinated Bondholders v. Integrated Resources, Inc. (In Re Integrated Resources, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Santa Monica v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- County of Sonoma v. QuailCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- County of Sonoma v. U.S. Bank N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Fritz v. Jimenez CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re Matthew W. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.