Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Jimenez CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 2020No. C084291Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/18/20 Fritz v. Jimenez CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- SPENSER FRITZ et al., C084291 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2016- 00198654-CU-CR-GDS) v. ROGER OTONIEL JIMENEZ et al., Defendants and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API