Legal Opinion
Leaf v. City of San Mateo
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1984No. AO15589PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RACANELLI, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Ron Leaf and Ellen Leaf, his wife, brought an action in inverse condemnation against defendant and respondent City of San Mateo (hereafter City) to recover subsidence damage to their property caused by a sewer project constructed by the City. A jury trial resulted in a special verdict in favor of plaintiffs fixing damages in the sum of $130,500 plus interest allowed by law. During postjudgment proceedings, the trial court awarded plaintiffs prejudgment interest on the net judgment from January 28, 1977, the date the complaint was filed,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ellis v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Zavala v. ArceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Filbin v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Lankster v. Alpha Beta Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.