Legal Opinion

Lankster v. Alpha Beta Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1993No. B069020PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

Desiree Rae Lankster, a minor, sued Alpha Beta Company for damages for personal injuries. Alpha Beta won (by a vote of nine to three) and Desiree moved for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct. Her motion was denied and she appealed, presenting us with a record sufficient to establish juror misconduct but insufficient to determine whether the misconduct was prejudicial. We hold that where, as here, an error is presumptively prejudicial, the burden…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Null v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. SutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Scheherezade Sharabianlou v. KarpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. English v. Mei Fhu LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API