Munn v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying to the defendant Earle C. Anthony, Inc. (a corporation), a new trial. The action was based upon alleged misrepresentations made by an agent of appellant regarding the year of manufacture of a certain electric automobile. Plaintiff negotiated with English, the agent of appellant, for the purchase of a secondhand electric automobile. She alleged and the court found that English represented that the automobile had been manufactured in the year 1913, when in fact it was a 1912 model. The car was offered to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Tockstein v. Pacific Kissel Kar BranchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Watt v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Campbell v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- J. B. Colt Co. v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.