Legal Opinion

Munn v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1918No. Civ. No. 2102PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying to the defendant Earle C. Anthony, Inc. (a corporation), a new trial. The action was based upon alleged misrepresentations made by an agent of appellant regarding the year of manufacture of a certain electric automobile. Plaintiff negotiated with English, the agent of appellant, for the purchase of a secondhand electric automobile. She alleged and the court found that English represented that the automobile had been manufactured in the year 1913, when in fact it was a 1912 model. The car was offered to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Tockstein v. Pacific Kissel Kar BranchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Watt v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Campbell v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. J. B. Colt Co. v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API