Tockstein v. Pacific Kissel Kar Branch
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor in an action brought by her to recover the sum of $412.06 as the aggregate of sums of money alleged to have been paid by her on account of the purchase price of a certain automobile from the defendant, and for repairs thereon, which machine is alleged to have proven defective, and in that respect to have violated the terms of certain alleged guaranties given by the defendant to plaintiff at the time of and which constituted the basis of the purchase by her of said automobile; and also to recover the sum of $420, damages alleged to have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Dollar v. International Banking Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Pease v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Campbell v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Floor v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.