Western Pacific Land Co. v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover the sum of $5,o00 had and received by defendant for the use and benefit of plaintiff.
Defendant answered, and without denying the receipt of the $5,500, set up by way of counterclaim a demand for the sum of $4,145.75 as and for the reasonable value of certain services rendered by defendant to plaintiff as its attorney for a period of three and a half years, and further alleged that on the fourteenth day of October, 1907, he paid to plaintiff the sum of $1,404.25, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- O'Neill v. Thomas Day Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Emerson v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Conde v. Dreisam Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Curran v. Bray Wood Heel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- Willis v. City Nat. Bank of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Miller v. MontgomeryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.