Legal Opinion
Curran v. Bray Wood Heel Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 4, 1949PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant a balance due for lumber and trucking of the same. The defendant pleaded the general issue, accord and satisfaction, payment and the statute of frauds. Trial was by jury with verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The case is here upon the defendant’s exceptions. Because of our view of the matter, we will first consider the exceptions to the denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff his evidence tended to show the following facts: — • The plaintiff and defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Hamilton & Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Barham v. Bank of DelightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Willis v. City Nat. Bank of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Western Pacific Land Co. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hanz Trucking, Inc. v. Harris Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Department of Fisheries v. J-Z Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Larson v. CandlishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Hato Rey Electroplating, Inc. v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
- Roy v. MugfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.