Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Thomas Day Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1907No. S.F. No. 3879PublishedCited by 38 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action by an employee of defendant to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant. The cause was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for three thousand dollars. From the judgment following this verdict and from the order denying its motion for a new trial defendant appeals.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff, who was a minor about sixteen years of age, was set to work upon a certain stamping machine without adequate or any instruction as to the use of the machine, without being informed that the machine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Emerson v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Edwards v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. MacPherson v. MacPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Weeks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Tousley v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API