Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Fox
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 3, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 26, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant worked part time as a sales associate for the employer. Although the initial terms of her employment had changed, the last change was implemented in December 2002 wherein claimant worked four days a week at the office and agreed to a change in her salary and commission. Thereafter, in June 2003, claimant asked to work a two-day…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of BartczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of GurtenboimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of SangiorgioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ErnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of EspositoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of FaisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of FaisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Kupiec (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- MatterofFaison[Commr.ofLabor]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014