Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Sangiorgio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 9, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 23, 2003, which, upon resettlement, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving *794unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant held a full-time position at an automotive dealership with major responsibilities for providing valet and loaner car service to customers, managing inventory and traveling to other dealerships to make car swaps. In November 2002, he requested and was granted permission to work part time. Beginning in January…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of Hobson-WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of MallimoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ErnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of FlorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of CollierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of EnneddamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of Carolyn D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007