Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Stoddard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 11, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 31, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimants were disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because they voluntarily left their employment without good cause.

Claimants resigned their employment as retail managers when their hours and salaries were reduced, due to lack of work, from three days per week at $175 per day to two days per week at $135 per day. Substantial evidence supports the ruling of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimants left their employment under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of OrensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re the Claim of RetzlaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of GatzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API