Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Gurtenboim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 20, 2002, which, inter alia, ruled *735that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant left her employment as a home attendant under disqualifying circumstances. The record discloses that when her last assignment ended, claimant notified the employer placement agency that she would not accept any future assignments. Her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of VitaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of RomanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of NadlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SeftelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Matter of Kupiec (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API