Legal Opinion

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of Burlingame

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1959No. Civ. 18239; Civ. 18132PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem. *

We have here two appeals, one by the plaintiff in the case of Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of Burlingame and the other by the defendant in Gray v. City of Burlingame. For the purpose of convenience of court and counsel the two cases were consolidated at the trial with a third ease from which no appeal has been taken and the appeals are consolidated and being heard on the records as made below. In the first case the main question at issue is whether the property of Safeway should or should not be included in a proposed parking district and in the second case the issue is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Robinson v. Bd. of Supervisors of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Tanzola v. De RitaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wing v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. White v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Harrison v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API