Legal Opinion
Western MacHinery Co. v. Graetz
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1940No. Civ. 6303PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES (G. L.), J., pro tem.
Plaintiff, in July, 1937, leased to The Mack Mining Company a certain piece of mining machinery known as a “classifier”, the lease or “Rental Agreement”, as it was headed, being in writing, but not recorded.
It was specified in the document that the classifier was “to be used at the Mack Mining Company property” situate in Placer County, the property belonging to the defendants herein and then in possession of the Mining Company under a bond and lease. The rental rate of the classifier was fixed as $275 for the first month and $150 for each subsequent month.
After the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Byron Jackson Iron Works v. HogeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bell v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Oberan v. Western MacHinery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
- United States v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.