Legal Opinion
Byron Jackson Iron Works v. Hoge
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1920No. Civ. No. 2180PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLUMMER, P. J., pro tem,.
The defendants and appellants are, and were during all the times mentioned in this opinion, owners of a certain mining claim situate in Nevada County. During the year 1915 the defendants leased said mining premises to the Willow Valley Mining Company, and thereafter the said Willow Valley Mining Company entered into a contract for the purchase from the plaintiff of a certain pump and electric motor to be used upon the min-' ing premises herein referred to. The pump and motor were delivered by the plaintiff to the Willow Valley Mining Company on or about the 15th of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Jordan v. MyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Consolidated Concessions Co. v. McConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ensign v. KoykArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Western MacHinery Co. v. GraetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Garnette v. MankelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- EAC Credit Corp. v. BassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- P. J. Freiermuth Co. v. FaustinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.