Legal Opinion

Bell v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1930No. Docket No. 7435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action in claim and delivery for the recovery of a steam heating plant.

There is no dispute concerning the facts. Plaintiff in the year 1927 entered into an oral agreement with one Patch to install a complete steam heating system and water plant in an apartment house which Patch was constructing in Berkeley. At this time nothing was said as to terms of payment. After the installation of the plant and after it was in full operation two payments were made by Patch ■upon the same, amounting to .the sum of $1900. Being unable to pay the balance due, Patch thereafter signed a conditional contract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Kohler Co. v. BrasunNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. King v. BlickfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. James Leo Co. v. Jersey City Bill Posting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Dauch v. GinsburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Western MacHinery Co. v. GraetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Patch v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API